How exactly is survival of the fittest not the same as equal
opportunities?
The 'fitter' ones merely make better uses of that 'equal
opportunity'.
You've probably answered your
own question.
This equal opportunity could possibly equate to the quota
stipulated by the universities for their undergraduate programmes.
So technically, everyone could have this equal opportunity of
entering universities.
True, but what i meant to Mister Gedanken is the brutal truth
that not everyone who have demonstrated their ability to study are
allow this 'equal opportunity' in a sense, because there is this
quota.
Everyone is competing for this limited number of vacancies,
henceforth, the survival of the fittest.
As such, am i wrong to say that this quota is a limiting factor
dictated by the people up there to ensure that only the
best of the best are allowed into the universities?
As such, am i wrong to conclude that the existence of such a
limiting factor, are solely not because there is no land space
in singapore, nor there are not enough taxpayers money, nor
whatsoever other less credible reasons, but the fact that the
authorities are in fact, governing the number
of people receiving tertiary education (i
mean Bachelor and above) such that the bell-curve ratio
would not be upset to a point where such qualifications would be
deem worthless?
And that's why i said, if any tom, dick and harry can enter
universities, who does the blue collar jobs? The degrees will
become worthless and everyone would be the same.